The Record · the registry bulletin
Week of September 14, 2026
Published September 15, 2026 · 5 items · RSS
Ledger
Ten surfaces confirmed gone, one channel back after five weeks — and three first-check flags that were alive
This week's review closed ten surfaces by hand: six Instagram accounts (three of them main accounts, a backup, a business account and one a creator's own domain pointed to), three X handles that now return "this account doesn't exist," and one YouTube channel that returns a plain 404. Nine are new entries in the ledger; the tenth was recorded on August 25 and stays gone. Each was read in an ordinary logged-in browser session on September 15, and a known-live account was loaded in the same session to rule out a block aimed at us. One came back: a YouTube channel with about 1.2 million subscribers that stopped answering on August 10 and was recorded gone on August 17 loaded normally this week, the same channel with the same name and videos, so its page carries the return and the five-week gap. Three Instagram accounts the automated checks had flagged as gone were alive in the browser at 37,000, 1 million and 1.4 million followers: login-wall reads, not deaths, and they never reached this ledger. The ledger stands at 247 events.
The vanished ledger →
Registry
Five weeks after Europe's AI-labelling rule, the personas' bios didn't move
On August 1, the day before the EU's transparency rule for AI content took effect, we counted how many of the 28 openly virtual personas in the registry said so somewhere on their own accounts — a word like "AI", "virtual" or "digital" in a bio, or a platform label. Nineteen did; nine did not. We counted again on September 7: nineteen and eight, the same names either way. One more thing the count shows: not one of the 28 carries a label applied by Instagram or TikTok itself. Every disclosure that exists was typed by the operator. That is the state of things on the accounts fans actually see; what the rule requires of the companies behind them is a different question, and not one this count answers. A caution before anyone names the eight: several of them disclose on Fanvue's own AI-creator marker, which our bio count does not read, so "no bio signal" is not "no disclosure". This week two of the nineteen changed their wording from "digital character" to "AI character" — still a disclosure, and the earlier words stay on record.
The documented AI influencers list → · Fanvue's AI rules, as published →
Registry
Seventeen women in the registry sell an AI version of themselves — the first ones didn't last
The Official AI Chatbots hub grew from nine entries to seventeen this month, every one documented on the woman's own page: a chatbot, a voice or a "digital twin" she launched, licensed or built herself. The earliest two are gone — Caryn Marjorie's CarynAI made $71,610 in its first week in May 2023 and went dark that October when the company behind it collapsed, and Amouranth's first bot died with the same company. Riley Reid's answer was to build her own platform, because unauthorized "Riley Reid" bots already existed; read directly on September 8, its homepage lists four creators and, alongside the chats, sells AI-generated photos of them. Lisa Ann's twin, launched this year and covered by CNN, runs from its own clearly labelled account. One entry is a different kind of thing and is labelled that way: Farrah Abraham does not sell a twin — an AI tool answers some of her subscriber messages, and tells the reader so. The other side is on the pages too: more than two dozen document a fan-made bot trading on a real woman's name that she never authorized, including one woman who is on the licensed roster. If it isn't linked from her own verified accounts or a documented roster, it isn't her.
Official creator AIs — the roster →
Registry
The biggest followings on OnlyFans are not the biggest earners — a new article, and a new page of counted numbers
Of the 556 women in the registry with an OnlyFans page on record, we could read Instagram follower counts for 379 in the week of September 7. The middle of that group is about 950,000; half are under a million. The names people call the top earners sit lower on that list, and the best-documented money figures are old and small — Bella Thorne's first-day million in 2020, Bhad Bhabie's six-hour million in 2021, and Blac Chyna's own on-camera correction against the twenty-million-a-month myth. We publish followings weekly and label every earnings figure documented or reported; we never rank by money, because nobody outside the company can. The full piece is a standing article now. Alongside it, a new page counts what the women in the registry actually do — which link hub, how many links, where the paid link sits, who has the badge — re-counted from every weekly read, aggregates only. One correction the work forced: Cardi B's OnlyFans row moved from "active" to "unclear," because her own link page lists no such account, and eight other pages that documented an account in their facts but carried no money row now carry one, with a new check so it can't happen again.
Read: reach is not revenue → · What the women in the registry do →
Money
Where the money rows moved this cycle
Read from the women's own surfaces in the September 14 capture and this week's paid-platform check: three OnlyFans rows moved from unclear to confirmed — two because her own X bio now carries the link, one because her own Linktree does; one X bio dropped its OnlyFans link with no closure on record anywhere else, so that row stands with the date noted; and seven paid-platform rows were added on four pages — LoyalFans, ManyVids and Mynx listed on one Linktree, Fansly on one creator's own site beside her OnlyFans, Mynx on another's own domain, and an OnlyFans page a fourth lists on her hub. As always on unclaimed pages, the rows carry no address: the account is on record, the route is not.
How the money gate works →