From the registry · counted, dated, sourced
Where the AI personas get paid: OnlyFans zero, Fanvue ten
Twenty-nine of the pages on this site are about a woman who does not exist. We know which paid accounts each one runs, because the operators say so on their own link pages. Put the rows side by side and the pattern is not subtle.
The count
The registry holds 29 documented AI personas as of September 17, 2026: 28 confirmed by the operator’s own disclosure or a platform label, and one, Jessica Foster, documented by an on-the-record newspaper investigation. Every page lists the paid accounts that her own surfaces point to, and our checks read each account every week to see whether it is still there.
Ten of the 29 have a live Fanvue account. None of the 29 has a live OnlyFans account. Three run a Patreon. Twelve sell nothing at all on any subscription platform: the brand characters such as Lil Miquela, Shudu Gram and Noonoouri, the pageant faces, and a handful of personas whose operators have simply never opened a paid page.
| Platform | Live | Gone | Named, no account found | What the rows say |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fanvue | 10 | 2 | 1 | Two accounts that existed and are gone (Emily Hart, Emily Pellegrini); one name where no account could be confirmed (Soraya Thorne). A fourteenth row sits on the Jessica Foster page, from the Washington Post’s reporting. |
| OnlyFans | 0 | 0 | 3 | Three pages carry an OnlyFans row only to say that no account exists under her name. On the Jessica Foster page, the Post documents a link that OnlyFans pulled. |
| Patreon | 3 | 0 | 0 | Eysan Aksoy, Natalia Novak and Mia Kehley. Two of the three pages are headed as AI on the platform itself. |
The ten live Fanvue accounts are listed, one per page, on the Fanvue AI creators hub. On four of them, our pages hold an archived copy of the profile carrying Fanvue’s own “AI generated or enhanced” tag: Bella Storm, Mia Kehley, Carmen Sofia Vega and Amara Davaux. On the Mia Kehley profile the tag was absent at our July 8, 2026 review and present by July 20, when the snapshot was archived.
The rules explain it
This is not a coincidence of taste. The two platforms have taken opposite positions, and both have said so in public.
Fanvue’s help centre calls AI creators “a fully recognised and verified category on Fanvue,” says the platform is “required by law to clearly label AI creator accounts,” and puts the label where a subscriber sees it before paying: “Every AI creator has an AI tag displayed in their profile bio.” Its AI content guidelines of July 22, 2025 require a “clear, prominent disclosure” on every AI-generated post or profile, and ban the things the disclosure does not excuse: deepfakes of other people, anything that could impersonate, and any under-18 likeness. The acceptable-use policy adds one more line a fan should know: if the AI tag was visible on the profile when you subscribed, you were told, and a refund on the grounds that she is AI is off the table.
OnlyFans has said the opposite, through its chief executive, on the record. At Web Summit in August 2024 Keily Blair said there were no “wholly AI” accounts on the platform, that building an AI-avatar product would mean “competing with creators for that attention,” and on the open questions of ownership and consent: “We haven’t cracked that nut yet.” Press reports had her repeating the no-wholly-AI position in October 2025. We could not read the platform’s own terms directly for this piece, so we quote the chief executive and not the rulebook; the rulebook, as the Washington Post found in one case below, is enforced.
Fanvue’s founder told Fortune in February 2024 what the bet was: a persona lets someone “get involved in the creator economy without having to be the person in front of the camera,” and subscriber behaviour toward a persona “is not that different.” Two years later the registry’s rows say the bet was placed.
Three cases where the move is on the record
Jessica Foster was a uniformed “MAGA dream girl” persona with no AI label on Instagram. The Washington Post reported in March 2026 that the account’s first paid link, to OnlyFans, was pulled because OnlyFans requires a linked account to belong to a verified real person, and that the persona then sent followers to a Fanvue account instead, with tips reported over a hundred dollars on a single post. The Fanvue bio read, without irony, “I’m not a robot haha.” The Instagram account has since vanished. Our page about it is a record of that reporting; it carries no link to the accounts and makes no claim about any real woman whose face may have been used.
Emily Hart never tried OnlyFans. The persona monetised on Fanvue from the start, with reported earnings of three to five thousand dollars a month, according to the Daily Beast; its operator described the build to WIRED under a pseudonym. Instagram removed the account in February 2026, about a year after launch. The Fanvue account is gone too.
Emily Pellegrini was the persona Fortune used to explain the model in February 2024, with Fanvue revenue reported at $23,000 for January 2024, up from $6,000 the previous October. That figure is reported, not documented: nobody outside the operation confirmed it. Her Fanvue profile began returning a missing-page error in July 2026 and her Instagram followed in August. No explanation is on record, and we do not invent one.
The third platform is quieter. Eysan Aksoy’s Patreon is headed “Created By AI” on the page itself, and Natalia Novak’s describes her as a “Virtual AI Model.” Patreon lets a page say what it is; it does not put a tag there for you.
What this means if you are a fan
If a page, a chat or a link is selling you “her OnlyFans” for any of the 29 names on the AI influencers list, it is selling you images of software, and not through the platform the software supposedly uses. Every AI persona with a paid account is on Fanvue or Patreon, and on Fanvue the tag is on the profile before you pay. If the tag is there, you have been told. If a profile under one of these names has no tag, that is a reason to stop, not a reason to believe.
What we publish, and what we don’t
We publish the platform and the state of each account, read weekly and dated. We do not publish a direct link to any paid page on an unclaimed record, whether the account belongs to a woman or to a persona, because a paid link is exactly what a scammer copies. An earnings figure appears only next to the label it deserves: documented when a platform, a named outlet or the operator put it on the record; reported when the press repeated it and nobody confirmed it. Every name above links to its page, where the source sits next to the row.
How this was counted. Base: the 1,203 creator pages in the VerifiedHer registry, a demand-, roster- and graph-selected set, not the platform or the industry. The 29 are the pages whose verdict is AI persona: 28 on the operator’s own disclosure or a platform label, archived at verification, and one on a named-byline investigation corroborated by platform action. Rows were counted from the pages as carried on September 17, 2026. “Live” means our weekly check saw the account that week; “gone” means the platform now returns its missing-page error; “named, no account found” means a platform is attached to her name somewhere and no account under it could be confirmed. Platform rules are quoted from the platforms’ own pages, observed September 3, 2026, or from named press.